Tag Archives: resurrection

Baptism, Resurrection Power and the Power of Visual Imagery

In our last post we looked at the communal meaning behind the Christian belief in the Resurrection of the Body. In this post, I want to look at how our individualistic tendencies can often skew our understanding about the basic building blocks of what the Christian faith is about. In my Easter Sunday message prep I came across the song “Resurrection Power” by popular Contemporary Christian Music (CCM) artist Chris Tomlin. I’d like to use this song as an example of this tendency.

As far as CCM songs go, this song is pretty much par for the course. The lyrics are loosely based on Scripture, in this case Ephesians 1:19-20, where Paul prays that the Ephesians will know God’s “incomparably great power,” which is the same power that “raised Christ from the dead.” Hence, resurrection power. As with most Tomlin songs, the tune is simple, uplifting, and infectious. What is problematic is not so much the song itself, but the visual depiction of baptism in relationship to the theme of resurrection.

In order for the rest of this post to make sense, you’ll need to watch the video:

First off, I think it is right and appropriate to tie baptism with resurrection. Baptism, at its core, is a sacrament of identification. We, in baptism, identify ourselves with Christ’s identification with us, so that what is true of him is now true of us. Just as Christ died and was raised, so we have died and are raised with him in baptism. Death is symbolized by our immersion underwater — a death by drowning. In dying we are then brought up out of the water indicating the new life we receive in Christ. We see this play out in the video.

So far so good.

But notice how in the video, it is a solitary individual, unsure of where he is going, unaccompanied, driving by his lonesome out into a remote field all by himself. Did I mention he is alone? Here, I think, is where the visual story telling goes awry in depicting what baptism is about (and by association, what resurrection is about). It seems to want to say that baptism is something we can do for ourselves. I have to admit, the way the scenes are cut and edited to fit the lyrics, I feel a certain kind of triumphant elation when the man plunges himself into the water just as the song builds in its climactic turn (right around 3:12). But that’s just it. Baptism is not a triumphant achievement. It is a gift we receive in humility. We don’t plunge ourselves into the water. We are baptized. We get baptized. Baptism is something someone else does for us, not something we can do for ourselves.

What is more, baptism teaches us that we are accepted into a new community. We are baptized into a people — the body of Christ. That is why baptism is never done in isolation. It is always before a watching community. A community of those who will support and sustain us in our new life as members of Christ’s body, precisely because they are the ones who are receiving and ushering us into that body.

Now, couple all this with the oft-repeated chorus, “Now, I have resurrection power.” What we are left with is the subtle suggestion that the power of resurrection is something we possess as individuals for our empowerment as individuals. All of this is a glaring example of the unrelenting focus on the individual in so much of what is labeled Christian in our culture. The individual is not a bad thing to care about, but what often happens is that we, as the proverbial saying goes, miss the forest for the trees. We see this at the end of the video where we find that maybe there is some semblance of a community forming. But no. It turns out they are just other individuals going to out to the same field to baptize themselves. It seemed to me like a guy finding a hidden Starbucks that paved the way for others to flock to it and get their morning fix.

Again, there is nothing wrong with the song itself. I actually quite like it. It is just to say that the visual story telling draws our focus inward whereas Scripture I think wants to draw us outward, outside of ourselves (which I think is how the belief in resurrection is best understood). If we read the passage in which the title of the song is based in context (Ephesians 1:19-20), we would see that the power Paul is talking about is a power that is able to unite what has for so long been separated by enmity and strife. The nasty division between Jew and Gentile. But now, as Paul tells the mixed community of Christ’s body, by the power that brought Christ up from the dead:

19…you are no longer foreigners and strangers, but fellow citizens with God’s people and also members of his household, 20 built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the chief cornerstone. 21 In him the whole building is joined together and rises to become a holy temple in the Lord. 22 And in him you too are being built together to become a dwelling in which God lives by his Spirit.

Eph. 2:19-22

Now, imagine if the video for this song was set to images of reconciliation in which those who have been estranged to the Church are suddenly welcomed into the body. This is the newness that the resurrection makes possible. We have been raised with Christ into a kingdom in which the marginalized and outcast are now at home among God’s people. None are excluded. So, what if at the climactic moment of the song we do not have a man baptizing himself, but the welcoming embrace of those who were once “far-off” now brought near through the saving work of Christ.

Now that would be some resurrection power.

The Resurrection of the Body

It’s been a while, but in our last look on the resurrection, we ended with this image of our lives being held in the memory of God as we await, what the Apostle’s Creed calls, the Resurrection of the Body. This is the orthodox way of expressing the hope for which we patiently wait. It is not the hope of the soul going to heaven when we die, but the hope of the “Resurrection of the Body.” The way it is phrased is wonderfully ambiguous. There are a number of ways to interpret what “the body” means, and when taken together they give us a fuller meaning of what salvation entails.

First, “the body” can mean Christ’s literal, physical body. The Resurrection of the Body is about the resurrection of his body. His body is the body, raised from the dead in advance of all others. As Paul writes, “Christ has indeed been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep” (1 Cor. 15:20). Christ’s risen body is like that first flower that blooms while the snow is still melting, giving us a glimpse of what is in store when spring comes and winter fully passes away.

Second, “the body” can refer to a figurative body. Think of Paul’s famous analogy of Christ’s body — the body of which we have been made members. It is a singular body made up of many parts. The body that is resurrected, in this case, is a people This, I think, is the corrective we need in thinking about salvation in the modern West. That is, we need to see salvation as a communal reality before it is individual. Or better, it is only individual because it is communal. This is something that is entirely glossed over in the “will you go to heaven?” way of thinking about salvation — a predominantly individualistic way of casting salvation.

Lastly, ”the body” can be taken to mean bodies in general. Here, the Resurrection of the Body is about the resurrection of all bodies, not least of which is our own. This is perhaps the most intuitive interpretation. I look forward to the day when my body will be raised. Of course this is true, but I think it best to understand resurrection in the order we have just laid out. The Resurrection of the Body is first about Christ, then about us, then about me.

Rather than seeing the story of Scripture told in five acts, we tend to see it, in our highly individualistic culture, as only three:

  1. Act ONE: Creation/Fall
  2. Act THREE: Jesus
  3. Act FIVE: The End

What is missing? Acts TWO and FOUR, which are Israel and the Church. The way we understand salvation deeply affects the significance we place on these two acts. When the individual is at the center of God’s plan for salvation, Israel becomes an oversight and the Church an after thought.

So it matters how we see the End.

Could we recast the End as our End and not simply my End? Or what if we saw our individual ends as inextricably bound up with the communal End described in Scripture? Then maybe we could better appreciate how integral Israel and Church are. For it is within the living memory of these two communities that the story of Scripture has been and continues to be kept alive. And through the ongoing telling and retelling of this millennia old story, we are given the resources to know that we are not just anybody, but made into somebody by virtue of our inclusion in the body, Christ’s body. It is in, through and for this body that we find our end and it is with this body that we will be raised at the end on the last day.

Do Not Imagine They Are Christians?! (Justin Must Be Trippin!)

This past Sunday (Easter Sunday) we looked at a rather harsh assertion by second century Christian apologist, Justin Martyr. Writing with what seems like a huge chip on his shoulder, Justin takes aim at those “who say there is no resurrection of the dead, and that their souls, when they die, are taken to heaven.” About such people he says, “Do not imagine that they are Christians.” They are in his eyes, “godless, impious heretics.”

What is so jarring about this claim is that what Justin calls heretical is precisely what we take today to be orthodox Christian belief. He is calling into question the very core of what we take the Christian faith to be all about. After all, isn’t this why we believe in Jesus in the first place? So that our souls will go to heaven when we die?

While we might not be inclined to raise the heresy threat level to code red, it is still worth exploring why this belief about our souls going to heaven is in the very least problematic.

On the charitable side, what we can say about the idea that our souls go to heaven when we die is that it isn’t wrong. It isn’t wrong, but it isn’t exactly right. Here, it is helpful to borrow a phrase coined by New Testament scholar N.T. Wright. He talks about life after life after death. That’s not a type-o.

Life after life after death.

What Wright means to say is that resurrection names the life that comes after what we commonly think of as life after death. What we commonly think of as life after death is the popular notion that our souls go to heaven after we die. Put this way, resurrection names the ultimate end for which we hope. That our souls go to heaven is only a passing moment. To imagine it as the whole of what we hope for is like mistaking the bathroom break we take before reaching our destination for the destination itself.

This helps us to realize that the Christian hope is not a disembodied hope. It is material. It is physical. It is resurrection. What happened to Jesus on a Sunday morning more than two thousands years ago is a preview of coming attractions. The biblical term is “firstfruits” (1 Cor. 15:20). As we often say, what we see God do for Jesus in raising his dead body from the grave is what God will one day do for all of creation (us included, God willing!).

This seems to be a more fitting end to the five-act story of (1) Creation/Fall, (2) Israel, (3) Jesus, (4) Church (5) The End. In this case, another title we could give to the fifth and final act is New Creation. The story is not about God abandoning creation, which is what we naturally come to believe when we assume that the ultimate hope of the biblical narrative is for our bodiless souls to end up in an ethereal heaven. But this, as we have been saying, is not the end for which we hope.

Resurrection is.

Resurrection preserves and honors God’s unrelenting and unfailing faithfulness to the good, good world created in and through the over-abundant love shared between Father, Son and Holy Spirit. In this way, the end becomes the fulfillment, not the negation, of the beginning. This after all is what we find in the pages of Scripture – that the completion of the good work begun in Genesis is consummated by the time we reach the end of Revelation.

But we know that people die and that their bodies are buried. We bury the dead and the dead stay buried. Resurrection is something that does not occur in the natural course of things. Indeed, it is something we must wait for; an event that will come to us at the fulfillment of time. So then the question remains, “What happens to us when we die in the mean time?”

We’ll pick this up in a subsequent blog post.