by
Ellen Huang
I’m
of the opinion dark humor saves lives. There’s some catharsis in being able to
joke about darker things in life, almost as if laughter helps us fear a little
less. The Addams Family is bursting at the seams with dark
humor— after all, it’s a family of gothic people who delight in everything
witchy and spooky—and yet I find there’s something about them that is
so…wholesome.
The
running humor in the black-and-white TV series is the shock of people who
encounter the Addams and enter their lovely home. The Addams live next to a
cemetery, they house the most unusual pets, their children play with headless
dolls and explosives, and they have connections with people all over the world
that the neighbors would consider crazy and strange. Living among their family,
the Addams also have a towering Frankenstein-monster-like butler named Lurch
and a disembodied hand called Thing that helps them with the mail, both of
which the Addams are very warm and appreciative to as if they no less than were
regular people.
Creepiness
aside, you’d also notice that their family dynamic actually looks really
healthy. Gomez and Morticia are very passionate, affirming, and supportive of
each other as equals. Their children Wednesday and Pugsley work together and
stick up for one another often. They speak very fondly of their dead family
members and are always very hospitable, be it to the fuzzy creature made of
hair Cousin Itt or to any old mortal human that comes their way. The kooky
family’s even comforting to watch, because they just seem to be overflowing
with love.
Funnily
enough, what is biblically said about love can almost all be applied to The
Addams Family. Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it
does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not
self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. (1
Corinthians 13: 4-5 NIV).
I
think film reviewer Lindsay Ellis (aka Nostalgia Chick) hit the nail on the
head when she said:
“The
joke isn’t that they’re cruel or bad at parenting or have any particular
disdain for the world at large. They aren’t unkind to their neighbors or to the
animals, and they’re deeply devoted to their children and to each other. They
joke is that they’re happy.
“The
Addams Family is missing a lot of the typical sitcom tropes. There’s no
mother-in-law jokes, no arguing over who is supposed to fill what gender role;
both Morticia and Gomez spend roughly equal amounts of time parenting the
children, and the most remarkable is the relationship between Morticia and
Gomez [. . .] usually working together. Rarely will party A keep something from
Party B but for the most part they form little schemes together as partners.
Both are heads of the household and they almost never disrespect each other —
in a genre where that’s usually the joke.
“But
the reason the Addams are happy is really because they exist outside of
society’s expectations. Gomez is a man child who plays with his trains and that’s
fine. Morticia fences with her husband and plays with weapons often. And it
doesn’t occur to them to care what people think.”
Something
that stands out to me as really refreshing about The Addams Family is
that they actually don’t dramatize their weirdness like many other edgy goth
characters in media. They don’t compare themselves to others or get defensive
about who they are. They normalize. Everything they offer their confused
neighbors is genuinely out of kindness + hospitality into their home, and their
lived realty is that what the world thinks of them doesn’t even exist.
No
one in their house is a burden, none of their odd friends are monsters, and not
even the normal humans who judge them are given anything but the benefit of the
doubt.
They
simply live, and they love unconditionally, and in doing so they show us
another way.
I
wonder if Christianity in particular is supposed to do that: show another way.
The
earliest Christians, being a minority so moved by Jesus that they were even
willing to die as believers, showed another way. In a world where family was
defined by long genealogy lines, they found family outside of blood, following
Christ’s example of emphasizing spiritual siblinghood (Matthew 12:48-50). They
were to recognize the Other as part of the same Body and no longer let
differences divide them (Galatians 3:28). In a world of hierarchy and
oppression, they were motivated by hope and provided for each other, even to
the point that “there was not a needy person among them, for as many as
owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold”
(Acts 4:34 NRSV).
Christians
were eyed suspiciously for their chosen community, their delight, for their
dangerous hope, for believing anything was higher than their emperor. People
judged them for their weird ritual of claiming to eat a body and drink blood
(perhaps there is danger in literalism) and rumor would spread that Christians
were a cult, cannibals, rebels, troublemakers. Was it some kind of joke, how they
caused a scene in their nonviolent protests such as turning the other cheek
when backhandedly slapped, or giving their cloak also when demanded for their
coat, or running an extra mile when forced to go one mile? Why did they see
humanity where they didn’t have to? In fact, in an 8th century description of
Chinese Christianity, engraved as a Xi’an stele inscription, Christians were
known for their unusual ways of not keeping slaves, but regarding all men,
regardless of high or low status, as equals. (Source)
The
early Christians, being an actual minority (much different than today), lived
outside of societal expectations. They didn’t hunger for power but acted as if
they didn’t need it. They were grounded in a culture of loving the neighbor and
the stranger, a faith in the unseen, a delight despite darkness, and a
repurposed symbol of resurrection out of what used to be an execution device.
They laughed without fear of the future. They declared where, O Death, is your sting?
They would become even more undignified than this. They were to be known for
their peculiar ways of loving even their enemies, believing greatness is found
in the one who is a servant to all, and fearing no death for their liberated
way of thinking.
In
the film The Addams Family Values, even when the Addams are all
hooked up to electric chairs by the villainously entitled Debbie Jellinsky, who
yells, “So long, everybody! Wish me luck!” the Addams are prepared to even wish
her good luck (killing them). It’s ambiguous, but I’d like to think this is
because they already knew that it wouldn’t kill them. (Other interpretations
include that they sympathized with their enemy, loved their enemy the entire
time. After all, they later bury her in the family graveyard).
Granted,
we are mortal human beings, and it isn’t best advised to actually be oblivious
to the rest of the world (especially during a pandemic!). Maybe in these days, we
actually should hold a healthy fear and responsibility for affecting others’
lives. Maybe rejoicing about the afterlife isn’t the only faithful response to
death. Maybe we can hold space for negative emotions about abusive enemies. Yet
all this can be true while looking at things another way. All while living into
an inclusive, redefined family dynamic such as that of the adoptive, hopeful,
diverse kin—dom of God.
The
joke is that they’re happy. They don’t need power, they
don’t need to be in the majority, they don’t need a spirit of dominance nor
conformity. They’re living as they’re created, and they’re happy.
I
feel our progressive “introvert church” Christ Kaleidoscope can be that kind of
light. Where love is patient, love is kind; it does not boast, nor envy, nor
insist on its own way. It does not dishonor, keep record of wrongs, nor rejoice
in wrongdoing. We honor everyone.
What
if love couldn’t run out? What if there was room for anyone to be family? While
justice and prophecy will win out, what if the powers that kill the body but
not the soul were not to be feared? (But please wear a mask, the Addams would
probably encourage that kind of mysterious look while saving lives still
anyway). What if we were happy being the inclusive outsiders?
And
perhaps in doing so, as Madeleine L’Engle would say, we’re “showing a light
that is so lovely that [people] want with all their hearts to know the source
of it.”