I’d like to start a series of posts exploring the question, “What is the Gospel?”
What is interesting, and perhaps more so, frustrating, is that nowhere in Scripture do we get a nice, concise answer to this question. Or perhaps, more pointedly, none that explains, to our satisfaction, what precisely happened in the death and resurrection of Jesus. Most of the time, we are merely told that the gospel is simply the good news that these things happened. The gospel is that Jesus died for us and that he was raised for us. This is what we see in the most straightforward account of the gospel we have in the New Testament.
1 Corinthians 15:1-7:
1 Now I want you to understand, brothers and sisters, the good news that I proclaimed to you, which you in turn received, in which also you stand, 2 through which also you are being saved, if you hold firmly to the message that I proclaimed to you—unless you have come to believe in vain.
3 For I handed on to you as of first importance what I in turn had received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the scriptures 4 and that he was buried and that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the scriptures 5 and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. 6 Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers and sisters at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have died. 7 Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles. 8 Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me.
The gospel here is equated with three essential events: Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection. And these events are attested to by witnesses to whom the risen Christ appeared. Whether these references to Christ’s post resurrection appearances are part of “the gospel” is unclear. What is clear is that the gospel is centrally about the fact that Christ died for our sins, was buried, and then was raised on the third day; and all of this according to the scriptures, which is itself another conundrum — nowhere in the Old Testament does it plainly say the Messiah would die or be raised on the third day.
But aside from the question of how the gospel is “in accordance with the scriptures”, what many of us are looking for is why. Why did Jesus (have to) die? Why was Jesus raised? Why is any of this good news for us?
Penal Substitutionary Atonement
By far the most familiar explanation, at least in Evangelical circles, is known as penal substitutionary atonement (PSA for short).
It goes something like this:
- We are all sinners.
- And because of our sin we are deserving of God’s wrath, which is God’s just and righteous response to sin.
- But the good news of the gospel is that Jesus comes to take our place. Instead of God taking out his wrath on us, he takes it out on Jesus. This is why Jesus had to die. Jesus came to die as our substitute.
- If you believe this, that Jesus died for you, then God will count his death on your behalf and you will be reconciled to God.
This account of the gospel is “penal” because it is largely about punishment. The sinner must be punished for the sins they have committed against a holy God. The only punishment severe enough to satisfy God’s wrath is death, which leads to the substitutionary part.
It is “substitutionary” because Jesus takes our place. He dies so that we don’t have to. His death satisfies God’s wrath and substitutes for ours.
Lastly, it is “atonement” because through Jesus’ death we are made “at one” with God (this is what atonement literally means — “at-one-ment”). We no longer live under the condemnation of God’s wrath. Our sins have been paid for and we are now brought into a new relationship with God.
In short, PSA says that Christ died for us (substitutionary) to take upon himself the just punishment for our sins (penal) in order to reconcile us to God (atonement).
I imagine for many of us, this just is the gospel. There isn’t really anything to talk about.
What This Series is About
But for others, you may have questions about this particular understanding of Christ’s death. In my case, there have been things about it that have always made me uneasy. At first it had to do with the notion of God requiring (human) death as payment for sin. But later it also had to do with whether this account is “in accordance with the scriptures.” On this last point, there has been more and more debate among scholars as to whether PSA is the best way to account for the biblical witness.
This series will be my attempt to collect my scattered thoughts and findings into one place to help me (and hopefully anyone reading this) come to a better understanding of what Scripture seems to say is the good news announced to us in the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus.
One final note for this introductory post: I don’t want to belittle PSA. Hopefully I have done it justice in explaining its key tenets above. My intent is not to attack PSA, but rather to explore how holding only to PSA as the entirety of the gospel can end up alienating us from other passages in Scripture that may be pointing in other directions regarding what God has done for us in Christ’s life, death, and resurrection.
With that, feel free to comment below about your own thoughts/observations/questions about PSA or the Gospel as you have come to know it.